[gen] source

atani atani at atani-software.net
Tue Nov 6 18:05:49 GMT 2001

> I don't believe that to be the case. If you make a derivative of MAME then
> you must be fully open source, but if you're borrowing bits it's at the
> discretion of the individual authors. That was my take on it anyway...

Interesting tidbit of information... Thanks...

> FWIW, Generator being open source is a good thing. I would just be inclined
> to go to something like the BSD license that does not force ports to be
> open sourced. Either that or come up with a license that states all changes
> to the core must be returned to the original sources...

I would be more inclined to go with say the X11 or Apache license ... they 
are derivatives of the BSD license but are more widely acceptable...


More information about the gen mailing list